Parent account and subscription terms candidate.
This working text maps the proposed one-parent, one-pupil service. It is here so the product and a qualified reviewer can find gaps before any checkout opens.
A qualified UK consumer, privacy and technology solicitor must draft or approve the final contract and checkout path. The director must approve the commercial policy. The current public website terms remain the only terms presented for today's no-account preview. This text is not an approved account, subscription, privacy, cancellation, acceptable-use, copyright, complaints, safety or security policy, is not legal advice and is not accepted anywhere in the current service. Parent accounts, paid pupil profiles, checkout, real uploads and pupil-facing AI remain closed. See the legal and trust status for the documents that apply to today's public preview.
Candidate version candidate-0.1 · prepared 7 September 2026 · no effective date
1. Proposed trader and contract holder
The proposed contract would be between the adult purchaser and ECOMMERCE ONLINE LTD, company number 12568562, registered in England and Wales, with registered office at 27 Old Gloucester Street, London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3AX. How2Revise is its product and trading name. The final contract must identify a monitored support and billing route before it can take effect.
2. Adult eligibility and authority
The account holder would need to be 18 or over and be the pupil's parent or carer, or have authority to set up and pay for the profile. The adult would create the account, make the purchase, manage billing and keep their sign-in secure. A pupil would never buy the service or accept recurring payment terms.
3. One account, one non-reusable pupil slot
The proposed launch product has exactly one parent-owned pupil profile for one pupil declared to be aged 13–16. The account has one pupil slot and one trial for its lifetime. Once a profile has been created, removing or erasing it would not let the same account add a replacement pupil or begin another trial. Under-13 paid profiles and direct pupil accounts are outside this launch product.
The 13–16 declaration would be an entry rule made when the sole profile is created—not a claim that How2Revise continually knows the pupil's age. The service would not collect a date of birth or identity document; the same non-replaceable profile may continue as that pupil gets older. The approved checkout and privacy notices must state this plainly.
The pupil would use a profile name and protected PIN. Billing, card details, invoices, cancellation and adult legal controls would stay outside the pupil experience. Sensitive adult actions would require fresh parent authentication.
4. Proposed service
How2Revise would teach a repeatable way to choose, recall, check, fix and return to schoolwork the pupil already lawfully has. It would not supply a full curriculum, replace a teacher or authorised material, write assessed work, predict grades or guarantee an educational result. Only features shown as available immediately before purchase could form part of the paid service.
The first proposed real-image feature would classify one short authorised page into a revision-method route. It would not provide a full OCR transcript, subject answer, marking service, PDF library or open-ended AI chat. A pupil would confirm or correct the suggested route and check facts against the original material or a teacher.
5. Proposed price and seven-day trial
One parent-owned pupil profile. Seven days free, then £14.99 every month until cancelled. Payment method required. Cancel online before the exact trial deadline shown at checkout to pay nothing.
The proposed subscription has no minimum term after the trial. Stripe would collect the adult's payment method and charge the first £14.99 at the stored trial deadline, then monthly, unless cancellation takes effect first. The checkout would show the trial end, first-charge date and time in Europe/London and the recurring billing behaviour before the adult presses “Start 7-day free trial”.
Working tax display: £14.99 is the total monthly consumer price. ECOMMERCE ONLINE LTD is not currently VAT registered, so VAT is not added. There are no delivery charges. The accountant and legal reviewer must re-check the live VAT status and exact price presentation before this text can be approved. No pupil-facing screen may contain an upgrade prompt.
6. Agreement evidence
Before leaving for Stripe, the adult would see the product, current feature limits, total recurring price, trial deadline, cancellation effect and approved policy versions. Separate unchecked actions would record the adult-authority declaration and recurring terms. A cooling-off or immediate-digital-performance acknowledgement would be used only if qualified advice settles that it is required and valid.
The service would keep the minimum agreement evidence: adult account reference, timestamp and timezone, price and trial dates shown, exact acknowledgement text and policy hashes, and the necessary Stripe identifiers and delivery events. It would not use invasive device fingerprinting merely to prove agreement.
7. Renewal, reminders and failed payment
The adult would receive a durable trial confirmation and clear reminders before the first charge, each showing £14.99, the exact charge date and a direct cancellation route. Payment receipts, failed-payment notices, renewal information and any proposed price or term change would go to the adult only. The pupil would not see billing pressure.
A final retry and grace-period schedule has not been approved. The final terms, Stripe configuration, account entitlement and messages must all use the same reviewed schedule. A material price or term change would require fair advance notice and a simple way to cancel.
8. Cancellation, cooling-off and refunds
The proposed adult dashboard would keep a prominent “Manage subscription” control. Cancellation during the trial before the stored deadline would prevent the first subscription charge. After a paid period begins, the current product proposal is to stop renewal and keep access through that paid period. Cancellation would be idempotent and confirmed immediately in the account and by durable message.
Subscription cancellation, pupil-profile removal and account deletion are different actions. Removing a profile would not reopen the once-only slot or trial. The proposed first-charge refund and the statutory cooling-off treatment are unresolved candidates, not promises. Read the draft cancellation, refund and cooling-off page. Nothing in the final terms may remove statutory consumer rights.
9. Account security and accurate information
The adult would provide accurate, minimal account and eligibility information, use a strong unique password, protect the pupil PIN and contact the service if access appears compromised. Credentials could not be shared outside the household or used to give another pupil the one profile. Passwords and PINs would not be stored in plain text.
10. Acceptable use
The adult and pupil would follow the reviewed acceptable-use candidate. The service is for honest revision practice, not cheating, abuse, unlawful content, attacks, safety bypass, commercial scraping, account sharing or infringement. Any restriction must be proportionate, recorded and open to human challenge. Safety help must remain available to a suspended user.
11. Pupil material and copyright
A pupil would keep ownership of material they are entitled to provide. The final terms may grant only the narrow, time-limited permission needed to protect, process and delete a short extract for the requested revision route. It must not grant a broad or perpetual right to exploit pupil material or use it for general model training.
The adult and pupil would need the right to use the extract. Whole books, exam papers, paid resources, confidential school documents and unnecessary personal information would be prohibited. Read the copyright and takedown candidate.
12. How2Revise material
How2Revise and its licensors would retain their rights in the branding, design and original content. An active account would receive a limited, non-exclusive permission to use the service for lawful personal and family revision. It would not transfer ownership or permit republication as another product, dataset or commercial service.
13. AI limits and human review
Any approved AI would be used only for the purpose stated at the point of use. It can be wrong or biased and would not be a person, friend, therapist, teacher, secret keeper or final decision-maker. The pupil would be told when AI is used and could choose the manual route, report an output and ask for human review. The AI transparency pagemust match the exact provider, model, retention and safety configuration before opening.
14. Privacy and parent visibility
Personal information would be handled under approved adult and child privacy notices. The parent view would show suitable method progress and settings, not every pupil answer, ordinary AI exchange or safety disclosure by default. A child's data-protection rights remain the child's. Read the current public notice and the child privacy candidate.
15. Safety boundary
How2Revise would remain a revision service, not an emergency or counselling service. It could pause a revision flow and signpost a trusted adult, Childline or emergency help. A message suggesting serious risk may need restricted human review and lawful, necessary sharing; secrecy cannot be promised. The final text must state actual monitored coverage and cannot claim continuous monitoring where none exists.
16. Availability, maintenance and reasonable limits
The service could use published, reasonable image, session, rate and cost limits and temporarily restrict a feature for maintenance, security, safety or legal reasons. The final contract must describe material limits before purchase, provide fair notice where practical and avoid an unlimited right to remove paid value without an appropriate remedy.
17. Suspension, termination and appeal
A serious security, safety, legal or misuse issue could lead to proportionate restriction. Except where notice would create risk or be unlawful, the adult would be told the reason, effect and route to human appeal. Decisions involving a child must consider the child's best interests. Emergency, privacy and complaint routes would not be withheld as punishment.
18. Closing an account and data effect
Closing an account would first block access and new checkout, reconcile and cancel live billing, then erase or retain each record under the approved schedule. The adult would be shown which data is deleted, which limited finance/agreement/safety record must remain and for how long. A deletion request would not falsely report completion while a provider or backup action is still pending.
19. Complaints and human decisions
An adult or pupil could complain about billing, privacy, accessibility, copyright, safety or an AI output and ask for a human review without retaliation or a reduced service. A pupil would not be forced through an unsafe parent. Final response targets and escalation routes can be published only after named people and cover exist. Read the complaints candidate.
20. Responsibility and statutory rights
The final allocation of responsibility requires solicitor drafting. It must not exclude or limit responsibility where law forbids that, including death or personal injury caused by negligence, fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation, and it must preserve statutory consumer rights and remedies. It must not use an absolute “as is” disclaimer to avoid the duty to provide the service with reasonable care and skill.
21. Third-party services and links
The proposed service would rely on assessed providers such as hosting, email, payments and a limited AI processor. Their role, data boundary and any terms affecting the adult would need to be stated where relevant. A third-party link would not imply endorsement, and the contract could not use providers to disclaim How2Revise's own controller or consumer responsibilities.
22. UK law, changes and document priority
The exact governing-law and court wording for consumers in England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland is unresolved and requires qualified review. The final contract must preserve mandatory protections and access to the courts available where the consumer lives. Mandatory arbitration or a foreign exclusive court would not be imposed.
Every approved version would have an effective date and immutable archive. Material changes would receive fair advance notice and fresh agreement where required. If an approved short summary conflicted with the approved full terms, the interpretation most protective of the consumer's mandatory rights would remain available; counsel must settle the final priority clause.
Contact during the draft stage
The legal and billing addresses are delivery-tested, but monitored human handling is not yet verified, so public email routes remain closed. Written comments can be sent to ECOMMERCE ONLINE LTD, 27 Old Gloucester Street, London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3AX, marked “Legal draft”. Do not include pupil schoolwork, passwords or payment-card details.